Anti-fraud investigations are akin to "housecleaning" within an enterprise, aimed at uncovering hidden fraudulent activities. In this process, "interviews" serve as a crucial investigative tool. When facing former colleagues now turned interview subjects, investigators must seek clues in this zero-sum game.

 What are the types of interviews?

Sandwich-style conversation: Start by building rapport and gaining trust through a gentle approach; then raise questions to make the other party aware of the severity of the issue; finally, offer positive feedback to alleviate their psychological pressure. This method can make the interviewee feel guilty at the end of the conversation, prompting them to confess voluntarily.

 Pressure-based interrogation: Using a stern and calm demeanor along with a rapid pace of conversation to intimidate the interviewee. This method is particularly effective against those who are nervous or guilty, as it can overwhelm them with authority and compel them to speak the truth.

What is the logic behind anti-fraud discussions?

 From Objective to Subjective: Guide the interviewee to gradually reconstruct the sequence of events and observe whether their responses are anomalous.

Branch first, then the main trunk: Begin by verifying peripheral issues, such as procurement regulations and bidding processes in cases of bribery; then proceed to inquire about the main issues, such as whether office positions were exploited to accept bribes.